October 2020 UPDATE: Attorneys Robert A. Buccola And Steven M. Campora Have Been Jointly Nominated By The Consumer Attorneys Of California, As Trial Lawyer Of The Year Finalists For 2020. Read More

Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, LLP

Sacramento: 916-379-3500

Auburn: 530-889-1800   San Jose: 408-275-1300

Carmel by the Sea: 831-293-6003 Orange County: 949-517-0425

Carmel by the Sea: 831-293-6003
Carmel by the Sea: 831-293-6003

Se Habla Español | Chúng Tôi Nói Tiếng Việt | Falo Português

Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, LLP

Sacramento: 916-379-3500

Auburn: 530-889-1800

San Jose: 408-275-1300

Carmel by the Sea: 831-293-6003

Orange County: 949-517-0425

Se Habla Español | Chúng Tôi Nói Tiếng Việt | Falo Português

Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, LLP

Sacramento: 916-379-3500

Auburn: 530-889-1800

San Jose: 408-275-1300

Carmel by the Sea: 831-293-6003

Orange County: 949-517-0425

Se Habla Español | Chúng Tôi Nói Tiếng Việt | Falo Português

We Make A Difference

We provide our clients with the highest quality legal representation
for their injury or loss of a loved one

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Results
  4.  » Vehicle Struck Median In Dangerous Condition

Vehicle Struck Median In Dangerous Condition

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22| 23| index

Settlement: $375,000 | Sacramento County | Lane v. City of Sacramento

The Sacramento Superior Court granted the city’s Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the case. Plaintiff appealed, arguing that a lack of prior claims does not equal lack of prior knowledge of a dangerous condition. The city admitted in depositions many vehicles had previously struck this median, even if no injury claims were presented. This case was fought all the way to the California Supreme Court, which affirmed the opinion of the 3rd District Court of Appeals, overturning the city’s victory on summary judgment. This resulted in a published opinion, providing supporting case authority for other injury victims. Lane v. City of Sacramento (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1337, 107 Cal.Rptr.3d 730.

Click here for the 3rd District Court of Appeals opinion.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22| 23| index